U.S. Sweepstakes Casino Availability Matrix (50 States + D.C.)
The table below reflects current statutory definitions, reported regulatory actions, and documented platform terms across all 51 U.S. jurisdictions. Click any state to review its dedicated CCM State Regulatory Guide.
| State / Jurisdiction | CCM Status | Statutory Basis / Enforcement | Effective Date | Last Verified |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alabama | AVAILABLE / NO SPECIFIC PROHIBITION | Standard promotional sweepstakes rules apply under Ala. Code § 13A-12-20. | N/A | August 29, 2026 |
| Alaska | AVAILABLE / NO SPECIFIC PROHIBITION | Alaska Stat. § 11.66.200; standard alternate method of entry required. | N/A | August 29, 2026 |
| Arizona | AVAILABLE / NO SPECIFIC PROHIBITION | Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 13-3301; standard promotional sweepstakes compliance. | N/A | August 29, 2026 |
| Arkansas | AVAILABLE / NO SPECIFIC PROHIBITION | Ark. Code Ann. § 5-66-101; promotional models operating without state action. | N/A | August 29, 2026 |
| California | ACTIVE ENFORCEMENT / HIGH RISK | Cal. Penal Code § 330; active plaintiff class-action litigation scrutiny. | N/A | August 29, 2026 |
| Colorado | AVAILABLE / NO SPECIFIC PROHIBITION | Colo. Rev. Stat. § 18-10-102; standard dual-currency operations active. | N/A | August 29, 2026 |
| Connecticut | RESTRICTED | Conn. Gen. Stat. § 53-278a; strict gaming definitions prompt some operator exclusions. | N/A | August 29, 2026 |
| Delaware | RESTRICTED | Del. Code tit. 11, § 1401; state lottery monopoly creates high regulatory sensitivity. | N/A | August 29, 2026 |
| District of Columbia | AVAILABLE / NO SPECIFIC PROHIBITION | D.C. Code § 22-1701; standard social gaming operations active. | N/A | August 29, 2026 |
| Florida | ACTIVE ENFORCEMENT / HIGH RISK | Fla. Stat. § 849.08 & FDUTPA; Attorney General lawsuits against Stake.us & VGW. | N/A | August 29, 2026 |
| Georgia | ACTIVE ENFORCEMENT / HIGH RISK | Ga. Code Ann. § 16-12-20; strict lottery and coin-operated amusement prohibitions. | N/A | August 29, 2026 |
| Hawaii | RESTRICTED | Haw. Rev. Stat. § 712-1220; complete statutory gambling prohibition without commercial exceptions. | N/A | August 29, 2026 |
| Idaho | PROHIBITED | Idaho Code § 18-3801; explicit constitutional and statutory bans exclude sweepstakes casinos. | Enacted | August 29, 2026 |
| Illinois | ACTIVE ENFORCEMENT / HIGH RISK | 720 ILCS 5/28-1; regulatory inquiries and civil complaints active. | N/A | August 29, 2026 |
| Indiana | PROHIBITED | Ind. Code § 35-45-5-1 & HB 1052; statutory prohibition enacted with civil penalties up to $100,000; major operators exited. | July 1, 2026 | August 29, 2026 |
| Iowa | AVAILABLE / NO SPECIFIC PROHIBITION | Iowa Code § 725.7; standard dual-currency models permitted under AMOE. | N/A | August 29, 2026 |
| Kansas | AVAILABLE / NO SPECIFIC PROHIBITION | Kan. Stat. Ann. § 21-6403; promotional sweepstakes active. | N/A | August 29, 2026 |
| Kentucky | RESTRICTED | Ky. Rev. Stat. § 528.010; extensive historical recovery litigation prompts operator caution. | N/A | August 29, 2026 |
| Louisiana | ACTIVE ENFORCEMENT / HIGH RISK | La. Rev. Stat. § 14:90; Gaming Control Board scrutiny over interactive gaming. | N/A | August 29, 2026 |
| Maine | AVAILABLE / NO SPECIFIC PROHIBITION | Me. Rev. Stat. tit. 17-A, § 951; standard sweepstakes operations active. | N/A | August 29, 2026 |
| Maryland | ACTIVE ENFORCEMENT / HIGH RISK | Md. Code, Crim. Law § 12-101; state and municipal enforcement scrutiny. | N/A | August 29, 2026 |
| Massachusetts | AVAILABLE / NO SPECIFIC PROHIBITION | Mass. Gen. Laws ch. 271; promotional sweepstakes standard framework. | N/A | August 29, 2026 |
| Michigan | PROHIBITED | MCL § 750.372; MGCB cease-and-desist enforcement against unlicensed dual-currency operators. | Enacted | August 29, 2026 |
| Minnesota | AVAILABLE / NO SPECIFIC PROHIBITION | Minn. Stat. § 609.75; standard sweepstakes models active. | N/A | August 29, 2026 |
| Mississippi | ACTIVE ENFORCEMENT / HIGH RISK | Miss. Code Ann. § 97-33-1; strict commercial gaming zone regulations. | N/A | August 29, 2026 |
| Missouri | AVAILABLE / NO SPECIFIC PROHIBITION | Mo. Rev. Stat. § 572.010; standard promotional sweepstakes operations. | N/A | August 29, 2026 |
| Montana | PROHIBITED | Mont. Code Ann. § 23-5-112; statutory definitions strictly limit internet gaming formats. | Enacted | August 29, 2026 |
| Nebraska | AVAILABLE / NO SPECIFIC PROHIBITION | Neb. Rev. Stat. § 28-1101; standard promotional gaming active. | N/A | August 29, 2026 |
| Nevada | PROHIBITED | NRS § 463.016425; interactive gaming exclusively reserved for licensed operators. | Enacted | August 29, 2026 |
| New Hampshire | AVAILABLE / NO SPECIFIC PROHIBITION | N.H. Rev. Stat. Ann. § 647:2; standard promotional models active. | N/A | August 29, 2026 |
| New Jersey | ACTIVE ENFORCEMENT / HIGH RISK | N.J. Stat. Ann. § 2C:37-1; DGE monitoring interactive social casino models. | N/A | August 29, 2026 |
| New Mexico | AVAILABLE / NO SPECIFIC PROHIBITION | N.M. Stat. Ann. § 30-19-1; standard promotional sweepstakes. | N/A | August 29, 2026 |
| New York | PROHIBITED | N.Y. Penal Law § 225.00 & S5935-A; NY AG C&D enforcement to 26 operators; VGW $8M settlement & market exit.Ð25/2026 | August 29, 2026 | |
| North Carolina | AVAILABLE / NO SPECIFIC PROHIBITION | N.C. Gen. Stat. § 14-292; promotional sweepstakes standard framework. | N/A | August 29, 2026 |
| North Dakota | AVAILABLE / NO SPECIFIC PROHIBITION | N.D. Cent. Code § 12.1-28-01; standard dual-currency operations. | N/A | August 29, 2026 |
| Ohio | ACTIVE ENFORCEMENT / HIGH RISK | Ohio Rev. Code § 2915.01; Ohio Casino Control Commission scrutinizing social casino operations. | N/A | August 29, 2026 |
| Oklahoma | SIGNED / PENDING EFFECTIVE DATE | Okla. Stat. tit. 21, § 981; statutory revisions pending implementation. | Pending 2026/2027 | August 29, 2026 |
| Oregon | AVAILABLE / NO SPECIFIC PROHIBITION | Or. Rev. Stat. § 167.117; standard sweepstakes operations active. | N/A | August 29, 2026 |
| Pennsylvania | ACTIVE ENFORCEMENT / HIGH RISK | 18 Pa.C.S. § 5513; PGCB maintaining active regulatory interest in uncertificated gaming. | N/A | August 29, 2026 |
| Rhode Island | RESTRICTED | R.I. Gen. Laws § 11-19-1; strict statutory definitions cause selective operator exits. | N/A | August 29, 2026 |
| South Carolina | RESTRICTED | S.C. Code Ann. § 16-19-40; broad anti-gaming statutes prompt operator exclusions. | N/A | August 29, 2026 |
| South Dakota | AVAILABLE / NO SPECIFIC PROHIBITION | S.D. Codified Laws § 22-25-1; standard promotional gaming active. | N/A | August 29, 2026 |
| Tennessee | PROHIBITED | Tenn. Code Ann. § 39-17-501 & SB 2136 / HB 1885; AG Skrmetti sweepstakes enforcement & statutory prohibition; operator cease-and-desist. | May 2026 | August 29, 2026 |
| Texas | ACTIVE ENFORCEMENT / HIGH RISK | Tex. Penal Code § 47.01; large market size attracts increasing civil and regulatory scrutiny. | N/A | August 29, 2026 |
| Utah | PROHIBITED | Utah Code § 76-10-1101; strict constitutional and statutory ban on all gambling formats. | Enacted | August 29, 2026 |
| Vermont | AVAILABLE / NO SPECIFIC PROHIBITION | Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 13, § 2131; standard promotional models active. | N/A | August 29, 2026 |
| Virginia | AVAILABLE / NO SPECIFIC PROHIBITION | Va. Code Ann. § 18.2-325; promotional sweepstakes operating under standard rules. | N/A | August 29, 2026 |
| Washington | PROHIBITED | Wash. Rev. Code § 9.46.240; explicit statutory prohibitions against online chance games. | Enacted | August 29, 2026 |
| West Virginia | AVAILABLE / NO SPECIFIC PROHIBITION | W. Va. Code § 61-10-1; standard sweepstakes operations active. | N/A | August 29, 2026 |
| Wisconsin | AVAILABLE / NO SPECIFIC PROHIBITION | Wis. Stat. § 945.01; standard promotional models operating. | N/A | August 29, 2026 |
| Wyoming | AVAILABLE / NO SPECIFIC PROHIBITION | Wyo. Stat. Ann. § 6-7-101; promotional sweepstakes standard framework. | N/A | August 29, 2026 |
States With Recent Regulatory Shifts (August 2026)
Florida: Attorney General Enforcement Against Operators & Payment Rails
In late August 2026, Florida Attorney General James Uthmeier initiated comprehensive civil litigation against major social casino operating entities (including Stake.us and VGW) alongside key payment processors (Worldpay, Trustly, Yodlee, Praxis). The action has elevated Florida into the Active Enforcement / High Risk category, prompting several operators to implement voluntary geofencing restrictions.
Oklahoma: Pending Statutory Revisions
Oklahoma legislative committees have advanced revised gaming definitions addressing online promotional sweepstakes structures. While existing platforms remain accessible pending the enactment and formal effective date of implementation rules, operators are actively reviewing terms of service for prospective adjustment.
Distinguishing Operator Market Exits from Statutory Bans
A critical analytical distinction in sweepstakes regulatory intelligence is separating formal statutory prohibitions from commercial market exits:
- Statutory Ban: A direct legislative enactment or formal court order declaring the dual-currency sweepstakes model illegal under state criminal or commercial gaming law (e.g., Washington RCW § 9.46.240 or Michigan cease-and-desist enforcement).
- Operator Voluntary Exit: A strategic business decision by a specific operator to discontinue serving residents of a state—frequently driven by commercial licensing conditions in other jurisdictions, payment processor risk covenants, or corporate restructuring—even where no specific state statute has changed.
- Operator Shutdown: The complete global cessation of a platform's operations across all jurisdictions due to insolvency or business wind-down, which should not be confused with a state-specific regulatory exclusion.
Methodology & Classification Standards
The CryptoCasinoMedia Regulatory Intelligence Desk evaluates state jurisdictions based on verified primary legal documentation rather than secondary marketing directories:
- AVAILABLE / NO SPECIFIC PROHIBITION: The state’s promotional sweepstakes framework permits prize-based promotions where a verified alternative free method of entry (AMOE) is maintained, and no regulatory enforcement action has been initiated against dual-currency models.
- RESTRICTED: Specific statutory restrictions (such as maximum prize caps or registration requirements) or selective operator withdrawals apply.
- PROHIBITED: State statutes, constitutional provisions, or formal regulatory orders explicitly bar online sweepstakes casino play.
- ACTIVE ENFORCEMENT / HIGH RISK: State attorneys general or gaming commissions have active lawsuits, cease-and-desist directives, or formal investigations underway against sector participants.
- SIGNED / PENDING EFFECTIVE DATE: Legislation has passed that will alter the jurisdiction’s regulatory framework upon reaching its future effective date.
Regulatory Disclaimer: This tracker is provided for editorial, research, and industry informational purposes only and does not constitute formal legal advice. Regulatory statuses and operator terms change frequently.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which states prohibit sweepstakes casinos?
Nine jurisdictions are classified as Prohibited / Blocked based on state-specific statutes, internet-gaming restrictions, licensing requirements, or formal regulatory enforcement. Distinct legal mechanisms apply: explicit sweepstakes statutory prohibitions and recent enactments (Indiana HB 1052, Tennessee SB 2136 / HB 1885, New York S5935-A), comprehensive telecommunications or constitutional internet gambling bans (Washington RCW § 9.46.240, Idaho Const. art. III § 20 & Code § 18-3801, Utah Const. art. VI § 27), licensing-based commercial exclusions (Nevada NRS § 463.016425), statutory online prohibitions (Montana Mont. Code Ann. § 23-5-112), and active regulatory enforcement frameworks with formal cease-and-desist orders (Michigan MGCB and New York AG James enforcement/settlements).
Are sweepstakes casinos legal in every U.S. state?
No. Availability varies by state, operator compliance models, and active regulatory enforcement postures across different state attorneys general.
Is Stake.us available in every state?
No. Stake.us restricts accounts from prohibited states (including Washington, Nevada, Idaho, New York, Michigan, Kentucky, and Vermont) and faces active litigation in Florida.
What is the difference between a sweepstakes casino ban and an operator exit?
A ban is a government legislative or judicial action. An operator exit is a private business decision to restrict players from a state to manage risk or licensing requirements.
• Primary statutes, regulator materials, enforcement documents and operator terms covering all 50 states and the District of Columbia.
• State Gaming Control Board & Attorney General Enforcement Bulletins (2026).
• Verified Terms of Service from Licensed and Social iGaming Operators.